comments:
Babes, I asked you, but all you did was whine and cry But hey, that's what's to be expected from religious conservatives Such a triggered baby Can't even defend momad yourself and have to find by scholars who say Confirms that the husband has the right to "enjoyment" from the moment of the contract even at 6 years old, even if full intercourse is delayed for physical reasons. Confirms that a father has the right of "compulsory guardianship" (Jabr). He can marry off his virgin daughter, no matter how young, without her consent. The limit is that while the husband should not penetrate the girl if she is too small and would be harmed, he is not prohibited from other forms of sexual intimacy or closeness (Muqaddamat al Jima). Explicitly permits "thighing" (Mufakhadhah), hugging, and touching with desire even for a "suckling baby," while forbidding penetration until age nine. These are your scholars
In Iran there is no limit or law that makes child rape under the guise of marriage illegal https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7887999/ Ayatollah Khomeini, their now dead religious leader has explicitly allowed child abuse in islam, stating in his book Explicitly permits "thighing" (Mufakhadhah), hugging, and touching with desire even for a "suckling baby," while forbidding penetration until age nine.
Shafi'i School: Mentions the limit for intercourse is the girl’s ability rather than the age nine. And marriage contract itself grands legal rights if she is ready for intercourse. Hanafi School: Confirms that the husband has the right to "enjoyment" from the moment of the contract, even if full intercourse is delayed for physical reasons. Hanbali School: Stated that if a wife is too young for intercourse, the husband can still “enjoy” her through kissing and embracing. Maliki School: Confirms that a father has the right of "compulsory guardianship" (Jabr). He can marry off his virgin daughter, no matter how young, without her consent. The limit is that while the husband should not penetrate the girl if she is too small and would be harmed, he is not prohibited from other forms of sexual intimacy or closeness (Muqaddamat al Jima). Ayatollah Khomeini (Shia): Explicitly permits "thighing" (Mufakhadhah), hugging, and touching with desire even for a "suckling baby," while forbidding penetration until age nine. The Book of Fatwas of the Islamic Network states: “There is no harm in ejaculating between the thighs of a young girl who cannot bear intercourse, such as masturbating with her hand, fondling her, and kissing her, provided that he avoids menstruation and anal intercourse….“ “Sheikh Al-Islam Zakariya Al-Ansari said in Al-Ghurar Al-Bahiyya: (And the husband) i.e., the husband (is permitted to enjoy) his wife in every way (even masturbating with her hand, even if it is not permissible with his hand, and even penetration into her vagina from the direction of her anus.” And here it says: “If this girl is too young to withstand intercourse... he may touch her, embrace her, kiss her, and ejaculate between her thighs.” As you can see from above. Even for the Quranist, who quickly ditch the Hadith to save Mohamed’s face, they are still left in a hard place. Quran permits it. Mohamed committed the act, which we will explore later. And the permission of Quran has lead being a pedophile a codified right in Islam. There is no middle ground that apologists can rely on. The law isn’t designed to protect the child’s development. It’s there to protect the husband’s “property”. The sheikhs who claim that Islam cares about children, is also holding on to this as divine truth.
This is an oxford study if you'd like but its quite long haha https://newlinesmag.com/essays/oxford-study-sheds-light-on-muhammad-underage-wife-aisha/ Are you using materials from an infidel university to defend Islam and prove what they say is better over what the Islamic primary sources an apostate like me pulls out? Masha Allah how the tables have turned 😄. Majority of the resources mentioned in your link are based off of scholars and rulings in countries which are not a true representation of islam. Which country? How about the fact that I mentioned Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia, Sheikh Abdul-Aziz Al al-Sheikh. I then quoted mohamed's imagined allah with Surah At-Talaq (65:4) right? Then I quoted classical scholars too. Ibn Kathir, Tafsir al Jalalayn, Tafsir al Qurtubi. Also the schools of thoughts, Shafi'i School, Hanafi School, Hanbali School, Maliki School also i added Ayatollah Khomeini (Shia) just to make sure shia is also there. And even more sources. Are you going to reject the Quran, classical scholars and Grand Mufti of Saudi? Hadith may have human errors too as they were written long after the time of the prophet by people. What about the sahih ones? I quoted them, my friend. Are you telling me you reject them and going to walk on our path? I mean we don't worry, we will hold your hand and won't kill you. muslim 'live their delusions' and sorry but death threats Imagine if someone tries to kill you because you are a Muslim. I mean, we do nothing wrong, and we are called names, gaslighted, harmed and given death threats. Just walk our shoe. First I wonder if you read my article or skimmed through it? Let's make a deal. I will read your link and answer back. You read my article and correct me properly. How about that?